Reader riposte: Why Apple doesn't buy a country

by Reader riposte - 4 May 2012 12:52PM

Anton Kuruc responds to yesterday's item, 'Why don't companies buy countries', which mentioned the concept of 'seasteading':

Seasteading is an interesting concept, because it offers companies the ability to create managerial solutions to problems government creates for them. But could this work?

Companies succeed because they improve their ‘fitness’ in the competitive marketplace. They succeed by cooperating with their customers, their incentive is to make a profit by better servicing their customers.

The picture Scott Adams paints is a monopoly where management is removed from the competitive context that drives them towards better serving their customers. In a monopoly, management has no incentive to serve anyone but themselves. Management would quickly realise that they can do whatever they want in ‘Applestan’, with ‘Applestani’ justice and the ‘Applestani’ police force. Imagine the punishment for the ideological transgressions of using Windows or smuggling in a Samsung Android phone! In such an environment my guess is that the company would rapidly turn into something worse than the overbearing governments they are trying to escape.

Besides, if Applestan was established as an independent country it would be much more vulnerable to a ‘hostile’ takeover or corporate raid from a nearby wealthy entrepreneur with a military force.

Lowy Institute for International Policy
Australia in the Asian Century

An Interpreter feature which ran from March to September of 2012, published to debate the Gillard Government's 'Australia in the Asian Century' White Paper, then in its research and consultation phase. Click here to see every post published in this series.

For commentary on the published White Paper, click here.

Australia's Defence Challenges

An Interpreter feature exploring Australia's defence challenges as the 2013 Defence White Paper planning process begins. Click here to see every post published in this series.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.